tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11943742098320009942024-03-12T16:29:13.693-07:00S H A I J I N XIf You Read It, You Will KnowShaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.comBlogger345125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-42942395488623692962009-12-21T16:40:00.000-08:002009-12-21T17:41:13.280-08:00BipartistupidityAlmost everyone's had to go to the car dealership and buy a new car. When you go, you go with a basic premise in mind; that both you and the salesman want you to walk out with a new car. Both of you want your situation to be different when you leave than when you came in. Starting from that premise, the negotiations are pretty easy. There about things like warranties, accessories, and price. When you leave with a new car you might say to yourself, " I paid a little bit more than I wanted too, but, I got an extended warranty and a new mp3 player installed. All in all, I'm happy with the deal." The salesman, after you walk out, might say to themselves, " You know, I didn't get them to spend as much as I wanted. However, my commission will still be nice, and, I got another sale so I'm closer to getting that ' Salesman of the Month' bonus. All in all, I'm happy with the deal." This is possible because both you and the salesman on the otherside of the table knew you would both benefit from getting you into that new car. <br /><br />Now imagine that salesman doesn't want to sell you that car. Imagine he thinks that you'll just make the car dirty if you get it so he's determined to make sure none ever leave the lot. Negotiations are gonna go a little bit differently. You ask if you can have an extended warranty, NO. You ask if you pay above sticker price if you can have a new and better stereo, NO. If you can pay under sticker price and let them off the hook for the warranty, NO. After awhile your gonna get fed-up and say, " Forget you then! I'll just go and build my own car." Now how many of us know or could afford to build our own car? Probably not many. So, you have to go ask someone to build it for you. They say, " Sure, but I wanna use it 3 days a week." You need a car so you agree. You borrow money to buy the engine, but the person you borrow the money from says they don't like speeders, so their only gonna give you enough money to get an engine that tops out at 60 mph. You agree. You go to buy the spark plugs, but you can only afford the economy ones that don't fire well so it's always rough to start the car. Lastly you get the shell but you can only afford an ugly rusty one. So what have you got: An ugly piece of junk that's hard to start, won't go past 60 mph, and you only get to drive 4 days a week. Now there's an argument to be made that you should scrap the car, get your money back, and come back at the endeavour when you've got better means. There's also an argument to be made that at least with a car you'll be able to get around better, thereby increasing your possibility for getting the means you need to improve upon your crappy car. There are valid points on both sides. However, let's not forget the reason for this predicament, i.e, the salesman being completely unwilling to negotiate with you for a good car in the first place. <br /><br />Democracy is based on one unchangeable principle: Nobody gets everything that they want. We are all free and equal because we are all equally disappointed in what we get from the bargaining table. But if you want a seat at that table, you have to be willing to lose a little bit. Does anybody think that if 10-20 House Republicans had come up to the Speaker and said that they would be willing to vote for Healthcare Bill as long as there was no Public Option, that the House would have one in their bill? Does anyone think that if 1-2 Senate Republicans had been willing to cast their votes in favor of the bill if their was Medical Malpractice caps, that the Democrats wouldn't now being telling their trial lawyer friends to please not be mad at what had to happen? You sacrifice some things you want in order to get others. You want good grades, your not gonna be able to party 24/7. You want a nice house and money to spend, your going to have to be at a job that for most people isn't greatly satisfying. You want a family, your days of doing what you want, when you want, are going to have to go out the window. The ability to sacrifice some things in order to get other, more important things. There's a word for it: Adult. Let's hope that those in Congress who would rather say 'No' then ' Maybe' acquire this ability before the country turns into a slow crusty lemon that only works 4/7 of the time.eastsd333http://www.blogger.com/profile/00779071824849563095noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-42599388199612038752009-11-18T20:08:00.000-08:002009-11-18T20:15:23.100-08:00Telegraph: Encyclopaedia Britannica 1768A few weird and interesting<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/6536532/Encyclopaedia-Britannica-1768-10-weird-facts.html"> facts </a>circa 1768:<br /><br /><br /><strong><em>Homo sapiens were sub divided into five varieties: the American, the European, the Asiatic, the African and the monstrous.<br /><br />Cures for flatulence included drinking chamomile tea and blowing smoke from a pipe ‘through the anus.’<br /><br />The US state of Callifornia was spelt with two ‘L’s’ and is described as ‘a large country of the West Indies. Unknown whether it is an island or a peninsula.’</em></strong><br /><br />Side note: Apparently in 1768, words were "spelt" and not "spelled". Hmm.<br />(In honor of my "Rent-a-Muse"...you know who you are.)Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-87133508592527422992009-11-10T04:12:00.000-08:002009-11-10T04:21:23.501-08:00It's A Left vs. Right World - We Just Live In ItFull size image <a href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/leftvright_world.html">here</a><br /><br /><br /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgieZyhqUpePf56JkLBqLt59-_wTZx34pSqtJcai7xT25AW7lGYa_j1th6oQtAs4R8jN9NZAItU9JeLU9fy2yvpxh7531w0mWu5vO1XGxxWsTsG0gI0ACXYhcekZ7g62bJU-UQTtCA_yc1O/s1600-h/leftright_EU_1416.gif"><img style="MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 400px; FLOAT: left; HEIGHT: 289px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5402447413113241906" border="0" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgieZyhqUpePf56JkLBqLt59-_wTZx34pSqtJcai7xT25AW7lGYa_j1th6oQtAs4R8jN9NZAItU9JeLU9fy2yvpxh7531w0mWu5vO1XGxxWsTsG0gI0ACXYhcekZ7g62bJU-UQTtCA_yc1O/s400/leftright_EU_1416.gif" /></a><br /><div></div>Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-7978316448502564272009-10-31T12:05:00.000-07:002009-10-31T12:05:00.140-07:00MediaMatters: Comparing FOX/MSNBCJamison Foser of <a href="http://mediamatters.org/">Media Matters</a> wrote a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/columns/200910300041">great piece</a> about the FOX/MSNBC/White House nonsense. In a nut shell, the White House has come to the conclusion that FOX News is not a real news organization, FOX says that MSNBC is the left version of them, and a ridiculous amount of people in journalism have decided to not only defend FOX, but also accept that equation. This is something Aaron Sorkin would pitch as a movie idea. Foser puts it all into a perspective that ignores the petty pundit soundbites and gets to the heart of the controversy.<br /><br />First, he discusses the actual programming content and the time allotted to partisan ideals on both networks:<br /><br /><em><strong>But hey, guess what? Maddow, Schultz and Olbermann account for three hours of original programming a day -- exactly the same as Joe Scarborough, who hosts the agenda-setting Morning Joe. That's conservative Joe Scarborough. Former Republican Congressman Joe Scarborough. And if you watch MSNBC during the day, you'll see a parade of anchors and reporters who frequently adopt conservative frames, pass along GOP spin, and routinely fail to challenge obvious falsehoods from conservative guests. I'm not saying these daytime reporters are conservatives, but I am saying they frequently (unknowingly, I'm willing to assume) traffic in conservative misinformation. Taken as a whole, it's awfully hard to say with a straight face that MSNBC leans to the left.<br /><br />And yet reporters keep insisting that not only does MSNBC lean to the left, it leans as far to the left as Fox. (And, in the process, they ignore or downplay the central truth that the real problem with Fox isn't merely that it leans to the right, but that it is fundamentally dishonest; that its goals are not to inform the public, but to destroy people it sees as its enemies.)</strong></em><br /><br />Next, Foser demolishes CNN's Campbell Brown for attempting to capitalize on this feud by agreeing with the FOX/MSNBC comparison:<br /><br /><em><strong>And in Brown's telling, MSNBC "leans left" just as much as Fox "leans to the right." Of course, Brown doesn't actually provide any examples; doesn't even name any names. In a segment that ran nearly 1,000 words, Brown didn't provide a single example of slanted commentary, flawed journalism, false claims, or anything else at all. No facts, no details, nothing.<br /><br />It sure is easy to insist that Fox and MSNBC are equivalent when you don't have to actually assess what they do, isn't it? But that isn't really journalism; it's just pontification and spin.<br /><br />But Brown can't offer examples; can't get into details, because if she did, the fantasy she constructs that Fox and MSNBC are polar opposites would fall apart.<br /><br />She'd have to try to find MSNBC equivalents of Fox -- not just Hannity, but Bill Hemmer and Brett Baier, too -- falsely accusing an Obama administration official of covering up statutory rape. And of Hemmer falsely claiming Democrats "voted to give special protection to pedophiles."<br /><br />She'd have to find the MSNBC equivalent of Fox reporter Jon Scott repeatedly being caught passing off GOP talking points (typos and all) as his original reporting. She'd have to find the MSNBC equivalent of Fox anchor Martha MacCallum having to apologize for passing off a six-month-old Joe Biden quote about the economy as a current comment -- a clip Fox deceptively cropped to make it appear Biden was saying something that he was actually criticizing John McCain for saying. And of White House correspondent Wendell Goler cropping an Obama comment and taking it out of context, completely reversing the statement's meaning in the process. Not Sean Hannity, not Glenn Beck -- Wendell Goler.<br /><br />She'd have to find the MSNBC equivalent of Chris Wallace calling the Obama administration the "biggest bunch of crybabies I have dealt with in my 30 years in Washington." Anyone think David Gregory ever said anything like that about the Bush administration?<br /><br />Campbell Brown knows she can't find any of these things, so she doesn't even try. And I haven't even scratched the surface of Fox's malicious and deeply dishonest attacks on those they disagree with; their assault on fact and reason, or their cheerleading for pet causes.</strong></em><br /><br /><em><strong>But even if Brown could find the MSNBC equivalent of all that and more -- which, again, she simply cannot do -- she'd still have to find the Fox equivalent of MSNBC handing over three hours a day to former Republican Congressman Joe Scarborough. And of MSNBC employing Pat Buchanan, the nation's most famous bigot. And of raging Clinton-hater, liberal-basher and on-air misogynist Chris Matthews hosting one of MSNBC's signature shows. And of MSNBC's "straight news" reporters regularly adopting conservative frames and failing to challenge right-wing lies during interviews. She'd have to find the Fox version of MSNBC's use of Michelle Bernard, a right-wing activist who has been sending out false and despicable anti-health care reform attack emails, as host of a special forum dealing with health care.<br /><br />Campbell Brown can't do that, either.</strong></em><br /><br />Read the whole thing <a href="http://mediamatters.org/columns/200910300041">here</a>.Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-81552485794813373042009-10-31T09:51:00.000-07:002009-10-31T09:51:00.766-07:00100 Hilarious College CoursesI find this <a href="http://www.onlineuniversities.com/blog/2009/10/100-hilarious-college-courses-that-really-exist/">list</a> fascinating for many reasons. First, the list is in subsections that do not prepare you for the actual class titles. For example, under the section reasonably titled "Life Skills", there is a Princeton course called "Getting Dressed". Furthermore, the section titled "Literature and Language" has a course called "Those Sexy Victorians". I'm willing to bet that class has a wait list.<br /><br />I also like the way the list was set up. Not only is there a brief description of every class, but each course title is linked directly to the school's actual catalog description. This way, you don't have to hunt for that Temple University course about UFOs in America. Instant gratification.<br /><br />The biggest reason this list fascinates me: I would definitely take a few of these classes. As odd as they sound, I have to admit I would take them. A few that stood out to me:<br /><br />Comparative History of Organized Crime. Henry Hill, Donnie Brasco, and more. Sign me up.<br />Purity and Porn in America. Because, well, you have to take a class in porn, right?<br />Nuthin' but a "G" Thang: I don't listen to Gangsta Rap. I want to embrace my inner thug.<br />The Office: Awesome, Awkward, & Addicting: I watch the show so might as well get credit.<br /><br />Which classes would you take?Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-41542296681129215672009-09-20T05:13:00.000-07:002009-09-30T16:31:08.716-07:00HCAN: Health Reform Chart under H.R.3200<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizovLqTSMVSgJfxBrxOLzCIfT2QvguoNsVEW6zxeKCVWOmlYfC-zm0AHaexjhJDFlFw5aYSSjAa48k1_6KN-ssdCBkk93qd98k-vMZEplrO_4Y1aKxIu2eJktGdw2EKCqIZHUV7hPNx8Yv/s1600-h/HR-3200-chartpg2.jpg"><img style="MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; WIDTH: 310px; FLOAT: right; HEIGHT: 400px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5383337122180211666" border="0" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizovLqTSMVSgJfxBrxOLzCIfT2QvguoNsVEW6zxeKCVWOmlYfC-zm0AHaexjhJDFlFw5aYSSjAa48k1_6KN-ssdCBkk93qd98k-vMZEplrO_4Y1aKxIu2eJktGdw2EKCqIZHUV7hPNx8Yv/s400/HR-3200-chartpg2.jpg" /></a> From <a href="http://healthcareforamericanow.org/site/content/what_health_care_reform_really_looks_like">Health Care for America NOW!<br /></a><div><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8CiNFOYc6GCFU_1bTk05d5Q4GF0MwawMngaZBd8HUZAtCL46RoO0KZzyFiIVc6VX324UogR5d1nA0Am6qrPEHxOCodFpIWvvFjWsE3oHDNR-U5XAK-f_DGPKGGkhQTUSf_4ml0cFxrxin/s1600-h/HR-3200-chart.jpg"><img style="MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 283px; FLOAT: left; HEIGHT: 370px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5383336542647932226" border="0" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8CiNFOYc6GCFU_1bTk05d5Q4GF0MwawMngaZBd8HUZAtCL46RoO0KZzyFiIVc6VX324UogR5d1nA0Am6qrPEHxOCodFpIWvvFjWsE3oHDNR-U5XAK-f_DGPKGGkhQTUSf_4ml0cFxrxin/s400/HR-3200-chart.jpg" /></a><br /><br /><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div>Read more <a href="http://healthcareforamericanow.org/site/content/what_health_care_reform_really_looks_like">here</a></div></div>Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-78817036156284720262009-09-19T17:31:00.000-07:002009-09-19T17:48:39.263-07:00What Cocktail Are You?Curious? Take the <a href="http://www.quizilla.com/quizzes/7465410/what-cocktail-are-you">quiz</a>.<br /><br />Apparently, I should be drinking a Martini. Who am I to argue? Where's the gin?Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-33816922232131918922009-09-19T16:51:00.000-07:002009-09-19T17:02:04.022-07:00Make Up Your Mind<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEju2MKr2WvRzBtczPK9sKZQbMcVl3JrndnckokMDHfPV8QLpAVzxg0oz1Lh2JY4Sl3XGUfddzHBDjYyZjf4qhEkD17rACAGcUYsHvnLF0lHI_Z9rqzqALahUTp1BFaLjlD6Db0Hjz4IcF-p/s1600-h/makeupyourmind.bmp"><img style="MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 238px; FLOAT: left; HEIGHT: 400px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5383331029789009474" border="0" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEju2MKr2WvRzBtczPK9sKZQbMcVl3JrndnckokMDHfPV8QLpAVzxg0oz1Lh2JY4Sl3XGUfddzHBDjYyZjf4qhEkD17rACAGcUYsHvnLF0lHI_Z9rqzqALahUTp1BFaLjlD6Db0Hjz4IcF-p/s400/makeupyourmind.bmp" /></a><br /><div>This picture from adamthinks.com is associated with an excellent <a href="http://adamthinks.com/tax-plan/">post</a> regarding taxes and the military. For those of you who hate snark, do not click the link. Oh, and get a sense of humor, dammit.</div><div> </div><div> </div>Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-29721933034721199262009-08-23T03:23:00.000-07:002009-08-23T03:23:00.242-07:00Taliban Cuts Off Fingers Of VotersFor the purpose of intimidation, the Taliban announced their plan for violence during the Afghanistan Presidential elections. They were not kidding.<br /><br />From <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/08/22/afghanistan.election/index.html">CNN</a>:<br /><br /><em><strong>Making good on a threat of election day violence, the Taliban sliced off the index fingers of at least two people in Kandahar province, according to a vote monitoring group.<br /><br /></strong></em><em><strong></strong></em><em><strong>After they cast their ballots, the fingers of Afghan voters are stained with ink to prevent them from voting multiple times. The fingers of the two women in Kandahar, a stronghold of the Taliban, were cut off because they voted, said Nader Naderi of the Free and Fair Election Foundation.</strong></em><br /><strong><em></em></strong><br />So, the next time Election Day comes around for you and all you can think of is the many excuses not to vote, think of this story. Think about these two brave women and the many more who voted knowing they were risking their lives. Then vote.Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-88138292289798722952009-08-22T12:00:00.000-07:002009-08-22T12:04:34.359-07:00Time:High Price of Cheap FoodBrian Walsh has written a <a href="http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1917458-1,00.html">disturbing yet informative piece</a> about the high price of cheap food here in America. The article covers many aspects including farming techniques, price-to-calories ratio and environmental costs:<br /><br /><br /><em><strong>But cheap food is not free food, and corn comes with hidden costs. The crop is heavily fertilized — both with chemicals like nitrogen and with subsidies from Washington. Over the past decade, the Federal Government has poured more than $50 billion into the corn industry, keeping prices for the crop — at least until corn ethanol skewed the market — artificially low. That's why McDonald's can sell you a Big Mac, fries and a Coke for around $5 — a bargain, given that the meal contains nearly 1,200 calories, more than half the daily recommended requirement for adults. "Taxpayer subsidies basically underwrite cheap grain, and that's what the factory-farming system for meat is entirely dependent on," says Gurian-Sherman.<br /><br />So what's wrong with cheap food and cheap meat — especially in a world in which more than 1 billion people go hungry? A lot. For one thing, not all food is equally inexpensive; fruits and vegetables don't receive the same price supports as grains. A study in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found that a dollar could buy 1,200 calories of potato chips or 875 calories of soda but just 250 calories of vegetables or 170 calories of fresh fruit. With the backing of the government, farmers are producing more calories — some 500 more per person per day since the 1970s — but too many are unhealthy calories. Given that, it's no surprise we're so fat; it simply costs too much to be thin.</strong></em><br /><br />This leads to a discussion I recently had with my brother about health care reform. The debate about reforming our health care system has been about cost from the very beginning: insurance premiums, deficit control, etc. This is understandable and expected. However, the strong (and sometimes twisted) debate has yet to turn to actual health <em>care</em> issues. The money aspect of the debate is important, but so is disease prevention, obesity control and exercise options. Food production and consumption plays into all of these issues. But this has yet to enter into the discussion. It is past time that it does. Health care reform without debating health is just health insurance reform. Just read the <a href="http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1917458-1,00.html">article</a>. Money does not solve the whole problem.Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-57099091533491463512009-08-12T06:38:00.000-07:002009-08-12T06:38:00.188-07:00Perseids, Rat-Eating Plants and More Random LinksJust a few quick hits before work:<br /><br />Have you checked out the <a href="http://meteorshowersonline.com/perseids.html">Perseids</a> yet?<br /><br />Do you remember the movie "Little Shop of Horrors"? Disturbingly funny flick about a man-eating plant and his owner? Well, a <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_news/newsid_8195000/8195029.stm">recently discovered pitcher plant</a> eats meat. Not just flies and mosquitoes. Rats. The plant eats rats. Creepy.<br /><br />It turns out, Senator Al Franken of Minnesota can <a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/41634/franken-begich-alaska-hawaii-map-draw-usa">draw the U.S. freehand</a> in about 3 minutes. No kidding. Very cool.Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-2611246950670083622009-07-30T02:56:00.000-07:002009-07-30T02:56:00.712-07:00The Health Of Nations: A Comparison<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgaHhaTBu9QMkk6lTJ9A4eQ7kFtE0H_ZSN_O7_gNf0KHcuefsf96fkAUldImB70cfQ30olkCpH_ZClRZgXNmW6H88H3kiVzzKLvw1dLEN1byHDXJAAVUn8V5TeJDl0zjEOlFVkOqQ0FcLpl/s1600-h/LAY-D-Health-LifeEx-tbl1.png"><img style="MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 375px; FLOAT: left; HEIGHT: 400px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5364066426535760034" border="0" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgaHhaTBu9QMkk6lTJ9A4eQ7kFtE0H_ZSN_O7_gNf0KHcuefsf96fkAUldImB70cfQ30olkCpH_ZClRZgXNmW6H88H3kiVzzKLvw1dLEN1byHDXJAAVUn8V5TeJDl0zjEOlFVkOqQ0FcLpl/s400/LAY-D-Health-LifeEx-tbl1.png" /></a><br /><div>From the <a href="http://www.conferenceboard.ca/HCP/Details/Health/life-expectancy.aspx">Conference Board of Canada</a>:</div><div></div><div></div><br /><br /><em>Canada has earned a steady “B” on this indicator for nearly five decades. Japan’s impressive increase in life expectancy has set a high bar for attaining an “A” grade on average in this decade, a standard that only Switzerland has met. Moreover, Japan, which had among the lowest life expectancies in the 1960s, has been a steady “A” performer ever since. Of the five top-ranked countries in the 1970s, only Japan has been able to consistently maintain its “A.” Switzerland lost its “A” in the 1990s, regaining it in the current decade.<br /><br />The Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden, on the other hand, have all lost their top-ranking status.<br /><br />The U.S. has also seen a decline in its relative performance. It earned a “C” in the 1960s and 1970s and dropped to a “D” in the 1980s, where it has remained.</em><br /><br />More links and charts <a href="http://www.conferenceboard.ca/HCP/Details/Health/life-expectancy.aspx">here</a>.Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-66532984509565327962009-07-29T17:41:00.000-07:002009-07-29T17:43:02.385-07:00The Stimulus Is WorkingFrom <a href="http://fastlane.dot.gov/2009/07/no-question-the-recovery-act-is-putting-americans-to-work-on-transportation-infrastructure.html">Fast Lane</a>, the Department of Transportation blog:<br /><br /><em>Here's the scorecard:<br /><br />•$22 billion--nearly half of DOT's stimulus money--made available to the States;<br />•Over 6,600 projects approved<br />•Over 3,200 projects underway right now<br /><br />And the future promises even more boosts to economic activity:<br /><br />•$8 billion in high-speed rail development<br />•$1.5 billion in TIGER discretionary grants</em><br /><br />Sounds great to me. Let's remember, there was never a promise of immediate relief. The President never said that no one would ever lose their job ever again. The stimulus is about creating and sustaining jobs as well as rebuilding our national infrastructure and expanding green technology to have a more robust economy and a better national future. There is a long way to go, but we could not have started without the stimulus.<br /><br />Ray LaHood, the Secretary of Transportation, <a href="http://fastlane.dot.gov/2009/07/no-question-the-recovery-act-is-putting-americans-to-work-on-transportation-infrastructure.html">says</a> it more succinctly:<br /><br /><em>I know the stimulus can't make up for every job our economy has shed. But we have supported over 5,000 jobs already, with up to 500,000 more on the way once the full effect of this landmark program is felt in the transportation industry.<br /><br />And every job we do create or preserve should be counted as a victory.</em>Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-38577807860404005612009-07-18T10:14:00.000-07:002009-07-18T10:37:14.662-07:00PopSci: 10 Facts About Apollo 11 Moon LandingWith the 40th anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing approaching, I thought I would present this <a href="http://www.popsci.com/military-aviation-amp-space/article/2009-06/40-years-later-ten-things-you-didnt-know-about-apollo-ii-moon-landing">post</a> from Popular Science. It is a list of 10 interesting facts about the mission. Personally, #2 really caught my eye: "The Apollo computers had less processing power than a cellphone."<br /><br />One can only imagine the possibilities if we, as a nation, had continued our initial investment in space exploration and massive science education. Hopefully, the upcoming 40th anniversary of man's first steps on the moon will renew that spirit of challenge and curiosity.<br /><br /><br /><em>We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win... President John F. Kennedy, <a href="http://www.famousquotes.me.uk/speeches/John_F_Kennedy/3.htm">September 12th, 1962</a></em>Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-33981917710189575842009-06-29T19:13:00.000-07:002009-06-29T19:14:31.455-07:00Random Stories That Intrigued Me<a href="http://www.npr.org/">NPR</a>: Soldiers are not alone in their suffering of PTSD. Dr. Anthony Feinstein <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105972083&ft=1&f=1020">estimates</a> that up to 12% of combat journalists suffer as well.<br /><br /><a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/">Dictionary.com</a> Word of the Day: <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/wordoftheday/archive/2009/06/29.html">clandestine</a>. <a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/">Merriam-Webster</a> Word of the Day: <a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/mwwodarch.pl?Jun.29.2009">skimble-skamble</a>. M-W wins.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.upi.com/">UPI</a>: There is a major radio ad campaign happening that you probably haven't heard about. People in Nova Scotia are being asked to not flush certain items down the toilet. Why? Due to a major failure at a sewage treatment plant, the beaches in Halifax are <a href="http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/06/26/Tampon-applicators-flood-Canadian-shore/UPI-33401246048779/">littered with tampon applicators</a> and other "floatables". Gross.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.reuters.com/">Reuters</a>: Queen Elizabeth wants to know <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUSTRE55S5ZE20090629">how many swans</a> she actually has. This involves her Swan Marker and her Swan Warden and skiffs. There is a lot of prep work involved so the official count is in three weeks. A swan census. This is serious business, folks.Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-89890454131003331962009-06-29T05:28:00.000-07:002009-06-29T05:34:33.537-07:00Gay Marriage Flowchart by Patrick Farley<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi3cITVrYUA6GGU30jsL-podF_KBN5QLb_X3ttzMPOgr7edOckibpbvy9TKy5vhHwi-bKYViCGB-BI8UxcUFSep-uxLy9SGEL9BpmN6q6d7PrvNV7w3iauaSb-t_Jp_npoUYGHFD5nuqjay/s1600-h/gayMarriageChart-large.png"><img style="MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 389px; FLOAT: left; HEIGHT: 400px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5352725859572883394" border="0" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi3cITVrYUA6GGU30jsL-podF_KBN5QLb_X3ttzMPOgr7edOckibpbvy9TKy5vhHwi-bKYViCGB-BI8UxcUFSep-uxLy9SGEL9BpmN6q6d7PrvNV7w3iauaSb-t_Jp_npoUYGHFD5nuqjay/s400/gayMarriageChart-large.png" /></a><br /><div><a href="http://www.geocities.com/patrick_farley/gayMarriageChart-large.png">Compiled</a> by Patrick Farley</div>Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-57781447808647061052009-06-19T10:09:00.000-07:002009-06-19T10:09:00.969-07:00Links About LGBT Issues, Jailed Journalists, Cookie Dough and More<a href="http://www.advocate.com/">The Advocate</a>: 2008 saw a <a href="http://www.advocate.com/news_detail_ektid91000.asp">28% increase in killings of LGBT people</a>. The 29 murders represented the highest number recorded since 1999.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/">The Business Insider</a>: Lara Ling and Euna Lee are <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/the-56-online-journalists-in-jail-right-now-2009-6">not the only journalists</a> jailed in foreign countries.<br /><br /><a href="http://online.wsj.com/home-page">The Wall Street Journal</a>: Will someone please explain to me how the government will <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124537164093129827.html">count married same-sex couples in the Census</a> if same-sex marriages are not federally recognized.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.treehugger.com/">Treehugger</a>: Phoenix light-rail is <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/06/phoenix-light-rail-metro-tempe-mesa-map-video.php">exceeding</a> daily ridership expectations. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/">The New York Times</a>: Nestle has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/06/19/us/AP-US-Nestle-Recall.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss">voluntarily recalled its Toll House cookie dough</a> because a few dozen people got very sick after eating it raw. Interestingly, the recall does not include its ice cream products with raw cookie dough. Go figure.Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-36176215397238840992009-06-05T17:02:00.000-07:002009-06-05T17:02:00.873-07:00Great Show By Rachel Maddow Last NightThe <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/">Rachel Maddow Show</a> was excellent again last night. The <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#31113549">clip</a> below is the first 15 minutes Rachel spent talking about President Obama's speech in Cairo yesterday. We get the fantastic Rachel Breakdown and, to wrap it all up, the great Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski.<br /><br /><br /><div><iframe height="339" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/31113549#31113549" frameborder="0" width="425" scrolling="no"></iframe><p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN-TOP: 5px; WIDTH: 425px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; COLOR: #999; FONT-SIZE: 11px">Visit msnbc.com for <a style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #999 1px dotted; HEIGHT: 13px; COLOR: #5799db !important; FONT-WEIGHT: normal !important; TEXT-DECORATION: none !important" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/">Breaking News</a>, <a style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #999 1px dotted; HEIGHT: 13px; COLOR: #5799db !important; FONT-WEIGHT: normal !important; TEXT-DECORATION: none !important" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507">World News</a>, and <a style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #999 1px dotted; HEIGHT: 13px; COLOR: #5799db !important; FONT-WEIGHT: normal !important; TEXT-DECORATION: none !important" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072">News about the Economy</a></p></div><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Also, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#31113674">classic snark</a>:<br /><br /><div><iframe height="339" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/31113674#31113674" frameborder="0" width="425" scrolling="no"></iframe><p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN-TOP: 5px; WIDTH: 425px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; COLOR: #999; FONT-SIZE: 11px">Visit msnbc.com for <a style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #999 1px dotted; HEIGHT: 13px; COLOR: #5799db !important; FONT-WEIGHT: normal !important; TEXT-DECORATION: none !important" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/">Breaking News</a>, <a style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #999 1px dotted; HEIGHT: 13px; COLOR: #5799db !important; FONT-WEIGHT: normal !important; TEXT-DECORATION: none !important" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507">World News</a>, and <a style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #999 1px dotted; HEIGHT: 13px; COLOR: #5799db !important; FONT-WEIGHT: normal !important; TEXT-DECORATION: none !important" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072">News about the Economy</a></p></div>Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-33248302225443027532009-06-05T14:06:00.000-07:002009-06-05T14:06:00.148-07:00Knowing Someone Gay Helps With Perspective On MarriageRecently, Gallup <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/118931/Knowing-Someone-Gay-Lesbian-Affects-Views-Gay-Issues.aspx">asked</a> people about their feelings regarding gay marriage. What makes this poll different than most? They broke down the results based on whether people were personally associated with gays and lesbians.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQeXm20jVGpnUWBxpgIr_WCHSA2n2JExvywK7M_zfQWMIJXA2FIWteVmFVs1vRUssaUf4g2MVjoUGgMk5n3bB8I0B71iO3qWmyswMq1wzIIGTjKRoHPaAaZWyPWBQQ3w0e3U6cR0XyhysJ/s1600-h/gallup1.bmp"><img style="MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 400px; FLOAT: left; HEIGHT: 181px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5343947857932889042" border="0" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQeXm20jVGpnUWBxpgIr_WCHSA2n2JExvywK7M_zfQWMIJXA2FIWteVmFVs1vRUssaUf4g2MVjoUGgMk5n3bB8I0B71iO3qWmyswMq1wzIIGTjKRoHPaAaZWyPWBQQ3w0e3U6cR0XyhysJ/s400/gallup1.bmp" /></a><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><em></em><br />From Gallup:<br /><em></em><br /><em>The Gallup Poll data reviewed above show conclusively that many views toward gay and lesbian issues are related -- in some instances, strongly so -- to personal experience with individuals who are gay or lesbian. There are two plausible explanations for this relationship. One is that exposure to gays and lesbians leads to greater acceptance, regardless of one's ideological leanings. The second is that people who are more accepting of gays and lesbians are more likely to put themselves into situations in which they are exposed to gays and lesbians -- in terms of cities and regions of residence, as well as workplace and social choices. Both of these processes are at work, though it is difficult to say which is more important.<br /><br />Whatever the direction of causality, the data do make a strong case that knowing someone who is gay or lesbian fosters more accepting attitudes on many of the issues surrounding gay and lesbian relations today.</em><br /><br /><br /><br />To see more charts, go <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/118931/Knowing-Someone-Gay-Lesbian-Affects-Views-Gay-Issues.aspx">here</a>Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-75240459782068426702009-05-26T05:44:00.000-07:002009-05-26T05:44:00.902-07:00NYT: CA Awaits Prop 8 RulingToday at 10am Pacific, the California Supreme Court will rule on the constitutionality and implementation of Proposition 8 which narrowly passed in November 2008. Why does the CA Supreme Court need to get involved again? Well, it's complicated. From the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/26/us/26gay.html?_r=1&th&emc=th">NYT</a>:<br /><br /><strong><em>Previously, in May 2008, the court legalized same-sex marriage, and since the election, several groups have sued, saying the proposition’s revocation of that right was unconstitutional.<br />In addition to answering that legal question, however, the seven-member court is expected to address the legal status of some 18,000 same-sex couples who were married in California between June — when the legalization took effect — and Election Day in November.<br />The state’s attorney general, </em></strong><a title="More articles about Jerry Brown." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/b/jerry_brown/index.html?inline=nyt-per"><strong><em>Jerry Brown</em></strong></a><strong><em>, said last year that he believed those same-sex marriages would be legal regardless of Proposition 8. But opponents of same-sex marriage argue that it is illogical to continue to recognize marriages that can no longer be legally performed here.</em></strong><br /><strong><em></em></strong><br />Want to know where same-sex couples stand legally now?<br /><strong><em></em></strong><br /><strong><em>Since the passage of Proposition 8, several states have legalized same-sex marriage, including Iowa, Maine and Vermont. Connecticut, where a court decision legalized same-sex marriage shortly before Election Day, began performing ceremonies shortly after California banned them. At the moment, married same-sex couples in California have the same rights as straight, married couples under California law, though same-sex couples have no federal recognition.<br />Like several other states, California allows members of the same sex to enter into domestic partnerships, which afford many of the same rights as marriage. But Kate Kendell, the executive director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, says domestic partnerships are not equivalent to marriage.<br />“It is more than symbolism to say that an entire category of recognition is off limits to one class of people,” Ms. Kendell said. “And the category that is off limits is the one that is most culturally desirable.”</em></strong><br /><strong><em></em></strong><br />Confusing, huh? Maybe it should just be absolutely equal for all. You know, for simplicity's sake.Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-90787714613353990912009-05-25T13:19:00.000-07:002009-05-25T13:29:48.965-07:00My Question to the President for the C-SPAN InterviewRecently, C-SPAN interviewed President Obama about an array of topics. They also asked the viewers to submit our questions to the president for the interview. Since question was not included in the interview, I'm just going to post it here. Maybe it might still find its way to him somehow...hope springs eternal.<br /><br /><em><strong>Mr. President, </strong></em><br /><em><strong>My question is in regards to the Don't Ask, Don't Tell law. I understand that there is a lot happening in the world and the country today that requires your immediate and continued attention. National security and commander-in-chief of the military is a major part of your duties as president. Both of these issues are directly affected by the DADT policy. Committed soldiers, marines, sailors and pilots are still being discharged by this policy under your administration. Furthermore, gay and lesbian military personnel who have not been discharged are being forced to break their oath to be honest and ethical because they have to lie to help protect this great nation. This is especially disheartening because you have stated that you do not agree with the policy. So my question is this: why have you not, at the very least, stopped the discharges from continuing while you wait for whatever you are waiting for to have the law changed?</strong></em><br /><em><strong>I look forward to your answer and leadership on this issue and I thank you for listening.</strong></em><br /><strong><em></em></strong>Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-39346892410845755702009-05-16T02:41:00.000-07:002009-05-16T04:04:00.011-07:00Star Trek: Where JJ Abrams Should Never Go AgainFirst off, let me say this post will contain spoilers, but as another dissappointed Trek Master said " the whole movie is spoiled" so what's the difference. JJ Abrams just proved to me why he was so successful with a show about a bunch of people not knowing what the hell is going. He just looked in the mirror and divided by 9. Not to copy Keith Olbermann, but WTF?! I don't even know where to begin. First off, the technical. The ship in that movie was NOT, repeat NOT, the original Enterprise. The original ship had a satellite dish atop its deflector array( that's in front of the bottom section to you non-nerds.) The ship in this movie was the NCC-1701-A, which was not created until Kirk was already an Admiral in his late 40's. Two, Uhura and Spock? Just, NO! Three, and most important, the timeline. If you make a movie about Colonial America, and then have everyone loving ol' King George and flying Jetsonmobiles, than at least have the common decency not to call it "Colonial America." Call it " This Ain't Real But It's Got Really Cool Special FX So Shut Up And Suck It!" At least then the people know what they're walking into. However, if you name a movie Star Trek, then you have to have everything happen within the already agreed upon timeline. You can't have Kirk becoming Captain of the Enterprise right out of the Academy. Hello, you missed a little thing like, oh, I don't know, HIS CAREER! Also, after 3 seasons of the original, 7 seasons of Next Generation, 7 seasons of DS9, 7 seasons of Voyager, 4 seasons of Enterprise, and 10 movies before this one, I think we would have heard about Vulcan being obliterated. I think it would have come up, maybe, over some Earl Grey or something. And what's worse, JJ knew that everything I just wrote was going to be said by a plethora of Trekkies. So what does he do? He slips in that because the timeline was altered, everything we're watching is actually an alternate reality. That way he's free to completely mess up the Star Trek universe, since technically, it's not the one we all know and love, but some weird alternate one, like that one burnt Cheez-It that comes in every box. Only there's a question that immediately pops into my head due to this approach: what do you do for an encore? Do you continue on in this alternate reality that bears no resemblance to the true Trek universe? Or do you admit you were wrong in to do this in the first place and come back to your senses? I'm hoping it's the latter. One heaping pile is already one too many, no need to duplicate.<br /><br />For all you non-Trek fans out there, this movie is what you want to see. It's full of beautiful people doing cool stuff amid explosions and phaser fire. However, if you're a true Trekkie like me and many others, either forget everything you've ever seen with the title Star Trek attached, or, before you go see this movie, make an appointment with your eye doctor, because as many times as your going to roll them, your going to want to get them checked out as soon as possible.eastsd333http://www.blogger.com/profile/00779071824849563095noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-43678342957432629312009-05-13T07:21:00.000-07:002009-05-13T07:21:01.112-07:00Pres. Obama and the DADT<a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/">The Daily Beast </a>has a <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-05-10/obamas-dont-ask-dont-tell-hypocrisy/">post</a> by <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/author/matthew-yglesias/">Matthew Yglesias </a>titled "Obama's 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Hypocrisy". It is a short post but here is my favorite part:<br /><em><strong></strong></em><br /><em><strong></strong></em><br /><em><strong>The game being played here is easy enough to understand. Obama's decision on a variety of fronts has been guided by a clear desire to avoid some of the early missteps made by Bill Clinton. And conventional accounts of Clinton’s early presidency put the way he got into an early dispute with the military brass over treatment of gay and lesbian servicemembers high on the list of missteps to be avoided.<br />But while the political logic behind the administration's thinking is understandable enough, the moral logic is contemptible. The dismissal of gay and lesbian soldiers was unjust when undertaken by administrations that believed in the policy. But disagreement about policy is inevitable in a democracy and sometimes injustice reigns. What we have today, however, is an absurdity—an administration that clearly does not believe in the policy, that is on record as opposing the policy, that campaigned explicitly on changing the policy, and that nevertheless declines to change the policy.<br />Tsao and Choi are being dismissed, in other words, not because the president of the United States feels they should be discriminated against, which would be bad enough. Instead, they're being dismissed because the president doesn't feel like doing anything about it.</strong></em><br /><strong><em></em></strong><br />Read the whole piece <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-05-10/obamas-dont-ask-dont-tell-hypocrisy/">here</a>.Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-22802319753585716892009-05-04T06:13:00.000-07:002009-05-04T06:13:00.337-07:00NYT: Going DutchI read this fantastic New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/03/magazine/03european-t.html?_r=1&th&emc=th">article</a> on my lunch break yesterday. It is about the Dutch economic and financial system, written by an American living in the Netherlands. After reading this article, my brother's words seem more potent: If everyone truly understood real socialism, nearly everyone in America would be all for it. <br /><strong><em></em></strong><br /><strong><em>For the first few months I was haunted by a number: 52. It reverberated in my head; I felt myself a prisoner trying to escape its bars. For it represents the rate at which the income I earn, as a writer and as the director of an institute, is to be taxed. To be plain: more than half of my modest haul, I learned on arrival, was to be swallowed by the Dutch welfare state. Nothing in my time here has made me feel so much like an American as my reaction to this number.</em></strong><br /><strong><em>[snip]</em></strong><br /><strong><em>And yet as the months rolled along, I found the defiant anger softening by intervals, thanks to a succession of little events and awarenesses. One came not long ago. Logging into my bank account, I noted with fleeting but pleasant confusion the arrival of two mysterious payments of 316 euros (about $410) each. The remarks line said “accommodation schoolbooks.” My confusion was not total. On looking at the payor — the Sociale Verzekeringsbank, or Social Insurance Bank — I nodded with sage if partial understanding. Our paths had crossed several times before. I have two daughters, you see. Every quarter, the SVB quietly drops $665 into my account with the one-word explanation kinderbijslag, or child benefit. As the SVB’s Web site cheerily informed me when I went there in bewilderment after the first deposit: “Babies are expensive. Nappies, clothes, the pram . . . all these things cost money. The Dutch government provides for child benefit to help you with the costs of bringing up your child.” Any parents living in the country receive quarterly payments until their children turn 18. And thanks to a recently passed law, the state now gives parents a hand in paying for school materials.<br />Payments arrive from other sources too. Friends who have small children report that the government can reimburse as much as 70 percent of the cost of day care, which totals around $14,000 per child per year. In late May of last year an unexpected $4,265 arrived in my account: vakantiegeld. Vacation money. This money materializes in the bank accounts of virtually everyone in the country just before the summer holidays; you get from your employer an amount totaling 8 percent of your annual salary, which is meant to cover plane tickets, surfing lessons, tapas: vacations. And we aren’t talking about a mere “paid vacation” — this is on top of the salary you continue to receive during the weeks you’re off skydiving or snorkeling. And by law every employer is required to give a minimum of four weeks’ vacation. For that matter, even if you are unemployed you still receive a base amount of vakantiegeld from the government, the reasoning being that if you can’t go on vacation, you’ll get depressed and despondent and you’ll never get a job.<br />Such things are easy for an American to ridicule; you don’t have to be a Fox News commentator to sneer at what, in the midst of a global financial crisis, seems like Socialism Gone Wild. And stating it as I’ve done above — we’ll consume half your salary and every once in a while toss you a few euros in return — it seems like a pretty raw deal.<br />But there’s more to it. First, as in the United States, income tax in the </em></strong><a title="More news and information about Netherlands." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/netherlands/index.html?inline=nyt-geo"><strong><em>Netherlands</em></strong></a><strong><em> is a bendy concept: with a good accountant, you can rack up deductions and exploit loopholes. And while the top income-tax rate in the United States is 35 percent, the numbers are a bit misleading. “People coming from the U.S. to the Netherlands focus on that difference, and on that 52 percent,” said Constanze Woelfle, an American accountant based in the Netherlands whose clients are mostly American expats. “But consider that the Dutch rate includes social security, which in the U.S. is an additional 6.2 percent. Then in the U.S. you have state and local taxes, and much higher real </em></strong><a title="More articles about estate planning." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/your-money/planning/estate-planning/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier"><strong><em>estate taxes</em></strong></a><strong><em>. If you were to add all those up, you would get close to the 52 percent.”</em></strong>Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1194374209832000994.post-20523568098682223652009-05-01T10:27:00.000-07:002009-05-01T10:42:46.023-07:00House Passes Credit Cardholders' Bill Of RightsThe Huffington Post has a great <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/caleb-gibson/house-passes-significant_b_194538.html">piece</a> by Caleb Gibson on the details of the bill and why even more is needed:<br /><em></em><br /><em> <strong>Pushback against egregiously unfair lending practices in the credit card market is mounting. And it looks like Washington is finally getting the message. On Thursday, the House of Representatives passed the Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights by a landslide vote of 357-70. The bill, championed by Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), would enact basic standards that eliminate some of the most exploitative practices in the business. Card companies will no longer be able to retroactively raise the interest rate on existing balances--except under limited circumstances, such as a 30-day delinquency. (This will put an end to "any time, any reason" rate increases) When the credit card companies do increase an interest rate, they will be required to give customers 45 days' notice. In addition, interest may only be tallied on balances in the current billing cycle, statements will be mailed earlier in the billing cycle, payments will always be allocated to the portion of the balance with the highest interest rate, and hefty fees for over-limit transactions will be banned unless cardholders explicitly permit it ahead of time.</strong></em><br /><em><strong>[snip]</strong></em><br /><em><strong> Well, not so fast. Unfortunately, there is a 12-month lag between enactment and implementation. Congress is essentially outlawing these practices as harmful to consumers and then allowing them to continue for a year. Indebted Americans cannot wait a year for fair treatment when every day brings more bad news for the family bottom line.</strong></em><br /><em></em><br />Gibson works for the excellent advocacy organization <a href="http://www.demos.org/">Demos</a>.Shaijinxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07594341312226397896noreply@blogger.com0